Former romantic loan denied, today lawyer legally assists in recovery
Recently, by Guangdong Zhiming Law FirmLawyersLawyer Zhang Qingping and assistant Tang Chanjuan from the team handled a private lending dispute case and ultimately achieved a complete victory!
[3] Mr. Guo and Ms. Xu were a couple. From 2017 to 2018, at Ms. Xu's request for loans, Mr. Guo transferred money to her multiple times. Later, Ms. Xu also used the excuse of making payments on her behalf to have Mr. Guo transfer funds to various accounts. In September 2018, Mr. Guo demanded repayment from Ms. Xu via WeChat, but she not only failed to repay but continued to instruct him to transfer money to others. Within just one year, the total amount Mr. Guo transferred to Ms. Xu exceeded 6.1 million yuan. Ms. Xu not only refused to repay but even denied borrowing the money. Faced with this thorny issue, Mr. Guo was like a mute swallowing bitter herbs—unable to express his grievances.
Mr. Guo was introduced by a friend to Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm, which specializes in resolving difficult, complex, and major cases, hoping to seekLawyersThe team's assistance. After discussing the case details with Mr. Guo,LawyersTeam lawyer Zhang Qingping and assistant Tang Chanjuan formally accepted Mr. Guo's commission. Faced with a large number of different methods of transfer records, Lawyer Zhang and Assistant Tang adopted a proactive attitude in litigation for artistic rights protection, diligently and meticulously cross-checking without rigidly adhering to conventional procedures, remaining flexible and adaptable, and even searching through voluminous WeChat chat records for clues to prove that it was Ms. Xu who instructed Mr. Guo to transfer funds to others' bank accounts. These transfers, which appeared unrelated to Ms. Xu, were in fact all loans to Ms. Xu.
After days of comparison and verification, Attorney Zhang and Assistant Tang finally compiled a detailed loan list, clearly specifying the amount, transfer method, and time of each loan. This strong evidence caught Ms. Xu off guard. Although she still refused to admit it during the trial, she was unable to refute the undeniable facts. After repeated checks, the court ruled that Ms. Xu, after deducting part of the repaid amount, still needed to repay the remaining loan of over 1.39 million yuan along with corresponding interest. Our side achieved a complete victory!
It is worth mentioning that in the first instance of this case, Ms. Xu only needed to repay our party more than 900000 yuan, which is significantly different from the actual amount lent by Mr. Guo. In the second trial, our lawyer once again upheld the enterprising spirit of never giving up on the lawsuit of literary rights protection, and emphasized that Mr. Guo's loan of more than 400000 yuan for decoration from the bank was also a loan to Ms. Xu. After careful review by the judge, Ms. Xu needs to repay this loan of more than 400000 yuan together, totaling more than 1.39 million yuan, in order to achieve a realistic and satisfactory outcome for the parties involved, and not disappoint our hard work and victory.
