Former romantic loan denied, today lawyer legally assists in recovery
[2] Recently, a private lending dispute case handled by Lawyer Zhang Qingping and Assistant Tang Chanjuan from the Wang Tengfeng lawyer team of Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm achieved a complete victory!

[3] Mr. Guo and Ms. Xu were a couple. From 2017 to 2018, at Ms. Xu's request for loans, Mr. Guo transferred money to her multiple times. Later, Ms. Xu also used the excuse of making payments on her behalf to have Mr. Guo transfer funds to various accounts. In September 2018, Mr. Guo demanded repayment from Ms. Xu via WeChat, but she not only failed to repay but continued to instruct him to transfer money to others. Within just one year, the total amount Mr. Guo transferred to Ms. Xu exceeded 6.1 million yuan. Ms. Xu not only refused to repay but even denied borrowing the money. Faced with this thorny issue, Mr. Guo was like a mute swallowing bitter herbs—unable to express his grievances.

[4] Through a friend's introduction, Mr. Guo came to Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm, which specializes in handling complex and difficult major cases, hoping to seek help from the Wang Tengfeng lawyer team. After discussing the case in detail with Mr. Guo, Lawyer Zhang Qingping and Assistant Tang Chanjuan from the Wang Tengfeng team formally accepted his commission. Confronted with a large number of transfer records in various forms, Lawyer Zhang and Assistant Tang adopted a proactive approach using the art of litigation. They meticulously verified the records without adhering rigidly to conventional methods, flexibly seeking clues even in the voluminous WeChat chat logs to prove that Ms. Xu had instructed Mr. Guo to transfer money to others' bank accounts. These transfers, seemingly unrelated to Ms. Xu, were in fact all loans to her.

After days of comparison and verification, Attorney Zhang and Assistant Tang finally compiled a detailed loan list, clearly specifying the amount, transfer method, and time of each loan. This strong evidence caught Ms. Xu off guard. Although she still refused to admit it during the trial, she was unable to refute the undeniable facts. After repeated checks, the court ruled that Ms. Xu, after deducting part of the repaid amount, still needed to repay the remaining loan of over 1.39 million yuan along with corresponding interest. Our side achieved a complete victory!
It is worth noting that during the first trial, Ms. Xu only needed to repay our client over 900,000 yuan, which was far from the actual amount lent by Mr. Guo. In the second trial, our lawyers, adhering to the never-give-up spirit of the art of litigation, emphasized that the over 400,000 yuan Mr. Guo borrowed from the bank for decoration was also a loan to Ms. Xu. After careful review by the judge, Ms. Xu was required to repay this over 400,000 yuan as well, totaling over 1.39 million yuan. This resulted in a complete victory that matched reality, satisfied our client, and justified our hard work.