Why did the woman who reported Qian Feng for rape choose to expose it online instead of reporting it to the police?

📅 2021-08-25 📂 Zhiming Hot Comments Zhiming Hot Comments 🏷️ #Notice of Decision Not to File a Case #Handled by Public Security Organs #Hunan TV #Case filing #Qian Feng

[4] Compiled from: Red Star News
 
Case review
[3] Yesterday, a netizen with the username "Xiaoyi hopes the bad guys are punished" (real name Xiao Mou) posted online claiming that she was raped in 2019 by Qian Feng, a well-known host of Hunan TV. She stated that she possesses complete evidence including audio and video recordings, but when she went to the police station, she was informed that the case could not be filed. After two years of suffering, she finally gathered the courage to make it public, hoping to bring Qian Feng to justice. This statement sparked widespread discussion online. Hunan TV immediately announced that it would actively cooperate with the investigation and suspend all of Qian Feng's work until the investigation results are released.

 
 

[4] Meanwhile, Shanghai police quickly launched an investigation and released a police report that same evening. The special task force concluded that the existing evidence could not prove that Qian Feng committed the crime of rape. Additionally, on March 15, 2019, the Changning police had already decided not to file the case, delivering the "Notice of Non-Filing of Case" directly to Xiao Mou and informing her that she could apply for a review with the public security bureau within seven days of receiving the notice. Xiao Mou did not raise any objections, signed to confirm receipt, and did not apply for a review afterward.
 
 
[5] Provisions on the Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs
Article 178
After accepting a case, if upon review the public security organ finds that a crime exists requiring criminal liability and falls within its jurisdiction, it shall file the case upon approval by the responsible person of the public security organ at or above the county level; if it finds that no crime exists, or the crime is so minor that criminal liability is not required, or there are other circumstances where criminal liability is not pursued according to law, it shall not file the case upon approval by the responsible person of the public security organ at or above the county level.
 
For a case with a complainant, if a decision is made not to file the case, the public security organ shall produce a notice of non-filing and deliver it to the complainant within three days.
 
If new facts or evidence are discovered after the decision not to file the case, or if the original determination of facts is found to be erroneous and criminal liability needs to be pursued, the case shall be promptly filed and handled.
 
Article 179
If a complainant disagrees with the decision not to file the case, they may apply for reconsideration to the public security organ that made the decision within seven days after receiving the notice of non-filing; the public security organ shall make a decision within thirty days after receiving the reconsideration application and deliver the decision document to the complainant.
 
[1] If a complainant is dissatisfied with the reconsideration decision on the case not being filed, they may apply for a review to the public security organ at the next higher level within seven days of receiving the reconsideration decision; the higher-level public security organ shall make a decision within thirty days of receiving the review application. If the higher-level public security organ revokes the decision not to file the case, the lower-level public security organ shall implement it.
 
[2] If the case is major or complex, the public security organ may extend the time limit for reconsideration or review, but the extension shall not exceed thirty days, and the applicant shall be notified in writing.

 

 
[1] The author's perspective
[3] It must be said that this year has seen many scandals in the entertainment industry, with one artist after another being exposed for illegal acts. Central media and major associations in the entertainment circle have also issued statements boycotting problematic artists. Previously, when Wu Yifan's rape case went from "innocent and sending lawyer's letters" to "suspected of crime and formally arrested," I already wrote an analysis. This time, we won't analyze the rape charge but instead focus on another legal point—non-filing of a case.
 

[4] As mentioned above, as early as 2019, Xiao had already gone to the police station to report the case, but she received a notice of non-filing of the case, and the police also told her that if she disagreed, she could apply for reconsideration to the public security organ within seven days. It can be seen that the police's actions at that time were in line with Articles 178 and 179 of the "Procedural Regulations for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs." However, Xiao did not raise any objection and signed to confirm, nor did she apply for reconsideration afterward. It can be said that there was no follow-up in legal channels. Two years later, Xiao decided to expose this matter. Even if Xiao later gathered more evidence, why did she choose the internet instead of filing a case? We all know that the influence of online public opinion is now very strong. So, just after the exposure, Hunan Satellite TV immediately suspended Qian Feng's work, and the police also launched an investigation. After the police issued a public security report, Xiao said she would organize evidence and file a case the next day. This makes me wonder: Does Xiao not really care about the legal path to punish the wrongdoer, but instead prefer to expose things online? Is the reason behind this Xiao's distrust of the police and the law, or is she too focused on the power of online public opinion and misplacing her priorities?
 
[5] Currently, many netizens are taking a wait-and-see attitude toward this matter, saying "let the bullet fly for a while." I believe that online public opinion is just a form of pressure; it may play a role in pushing things forward, but it is not a real solution to the problem, nor is it a means to bring the wrongdoer to justice. Since Xiao firmly stated that Qian Feng raped her, she should actively cooperate with the police investigation, which would also help the truth come to light sooner.

⚖️ Start Your Professional Legal Service Journey Now

Professional legal team, providing one-stop legal solutions

  • @ Email: zhiminglawfirm@126.com
  • WeChat ID:zhiminglawyer01
  • 💬 WeChat: gd_zhiming

Business hours 9:00-18:00 · Fast Response · Strict Confidentiality · Professional & Efficient

Consultation QR Code

Scan the QR code for consultation

Law Firm Official Account

Scan to follow us

"WeChat Help"
微信二维码
"Press and hold on QR code"
"Add WeChat Inquiry"
×
微信二维码
"Press and hold on QR code"
"Add WeChat Inquiry"