广东知明律师事务所靠谱吗？

广东知明律所是深圳26年老牌律所，由沈金龙主任律师创办，专注疑难复杂案件，累计代理案件超10000件，独创策略维权体系获省、市律协双项创新奖。

深圳刑事案件黄金37天是什么意思？

刑事拘留到检察院批捕最长37天，这期间律师介入可以申请取保候审、提交法律意见，一旦批捕后续翻案难度大增。

深圳劳动仲裁要多久？

深圳劳动仲裁审理期限一般为45天，复杂案件可延长15天，不服裁决15天内可向法院起诉。

深圳找律师打官司怎么收费？

深圳律师收费方式有按标的额比例、计时、风险代理三种。一般民事诉讼按标的额3%-10%收取，刑事案件按阶段收费。

深圳合同纠纷律师怎么选？

看律所年限、律师执业经验、案例质量、收费标准是否透明。知明律所提供首次免费咨询，可预约到所面谈。

深圳离婚财产怎么分割？

深圳离婚财产分割遵循《民法典》规定：夫妻共同财产原则上平分，但有过错方少分。房产、股权、理财等需评估后分割。

深圳买房被中介骗了找谁？

可以收集证据向深圳市住建局投诉、向公安机关报案、或委托律师提起民事诉讼要求赔偿。

深圳交通事故赔偿标准多少？

深圳交通事故赔偿含医疗费、误工费、护理费、残疾赔偿金、精神损害抚慰金等，具体金额需根据伤残等级计算。

深圳律师在线咨询|刑事辩护·民商诉讼·合同纠纷·股权纠纷-广东知明律师事务所

The Post-Courtroom Secret War of the "Sea Palace" Case — The Ultimate Reveal of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 23)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Two: The Chivalrous Lawyer Rescues the "Sea Palace" According to Law 9. Post-Trial Secret Struggles The Administrative Procedure Law has been in effect for over twenty years, yet the operation of the administrative litigation system has never achieved ideal results. One of the main reasons is the excessive strength of administrative power in China and the excessive weakness and lack of basic independence of judicial power. Hamilton, a statesman from the founding period of the United States, once made a very incisive remark on the issue of judicial independence in *The Federalist Papers*: "In the general course of human nature, a power over a man's subsistence..."

Read More →

The "Sea Palace" Case: Settlement and Withdrawal of Lawsuit — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 24)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Two: The Chivalrous Lawyer Rescues the "Sea Palace" According to Law 10. Settlement and Withdrawal of Lawsuit On December 30, 2011, Shenzhen's Dapeng New District, which governs the Nan'ao Dongshan Bay area where the "Sea Palace" is located, was officially established. The "Sea Palace" case, which had been dragging on for half a year, still had no verdict. In May 2012, He Yongzhi, former director of the Shenzhen Oceanic Administration, was transferred to serve as director of the Dapeng New District Management Committee. At this time, in order to align with the innovative development of the Dapeng New District, Shenzhen...

Read More →

[1] The Joyful Rebirth of the "Sea Palace" — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 25)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Two: The Chivalrous Lawyer Rescues the "Sea Palace" According to Law 11. Joyful Rebirth After seven or eight years of entanglement and struggle between rights and power, enduring countless natural storms, weathering two waves of public opinion turmoil, and surviving nearly a year of courtroom battles and struggles inside and outside administrative litigation, the "Sea Palace" still stubbornly exists between the blue sky, white clouds, green mountains, and azure sea of Dongshan Bay in Nan'ao—low-key but joyful! Media unaware of the truth have also come to pay attention to the "Sea Palace" once again.

Read More →

Part Three: Lawyers Defend Rights, Bravely Challenging the Legal Affairs Office — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 26)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

The assertion of rights is a duty of spiritual self-preservation; the complete renunciation of rights is spiritual suicide. — Jhering, *The Struggle for Law* 1. Introduction The renowned German legal philosopher Jhering points out in his masterpiece *The Struggle for Law* that all rights face the danger of being infringed upon or suppressed, because the interests claimed by the right-holder often conflict with the interests of others who deny those claims. Therefore, the prerequisite for enjoying rights lies in being constantly prepared to assert them; to realize rights, one must always be ready to fight for them.

Read More →

Speaking out for justice invites government suppression! — The ultimate revelation of the "Sea Palace" case (Serial 27)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Three: Lawyers Defend Rights, Bravely Challenge the Legal Affairs Office 2. Speaking Out for Justice Invites Government Suppression Since the outbreak of the "Sea Palace" media storm, lawyer Wang Tengfeng has been closely following the developments of the incident. Later, seeing the media and public opinion launch an irrational bombardment and relentless pursuit against the "Sea Palace," and witnessing government departments lacking any principles or sense of responsibility, instead losing their footing under the weight and coercion of public opinion, committing a series of illegal administrative actions—especially seeing many so-called renowned legal scholars...

Read More →

Suing the Municipal Legal Affairs Office! — The Ultimate Reveal of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 28)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Three: Lawyers Bravely Challenge the Legal Affairs Office in Defense of Rights 3. Suing the Municipal Government Legal Affairs Office The report that the Shenzhen Municipal Government Legal Affairs Office forced *Southern Daily* to publish appeared superficially to be "factual," and its content was indeed based on facts. However, its headline highlighted the name "Wang Tengfeng," its content overlooked the reporting errors made by the newspaper's journalists, and its format was a news report rather than the newspaper's own correction notice. Taken together, these factors would naturally lead any person of normal reasoning ability who had read both the original and subsequent reports to...

Read More →

Minor Errors in the First Instance Verdict of the Case Within the "Sea Palace" Case — Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 29)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Three: Lawyers Bravely Challenge the Legal Affairs Office in Defense of Rights 4. Minor Errors in the First-Instance Judgment According to Article 7 of the Supreme People's Court's "Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Defamation Cases," whether liability for defamation is established should be determined by comprehensively considering factors such as the fact that the victim has indeed suffered damage to their reputation, the perpetrator's commission of an illegal act, the causal relationship between the illegal act and the harmful consequences, and the perpetrator's subjective fault. Since damage to reputation is a form of intangible harm, proving the "fact that the victim has indeed suffered damage to their reputation" is extremely difficult, both in theory and in practice.

Read More →

The second-instance verdict in the "Sea Palace" case-within-a-case is gravely wrong — The ultimate revelation of the "Sea Palace" case (Serial 30)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Three: Lawyers Bravely Challenge the Legal Affairs Office in Rights Protection 5. Gross Errors in the Second-Instance Verdict The first-instance "Civil Judgment" was dated July 6, 2012, but was not served to the parties until October of that year. Attorney Wang Tengfeng argued that the first-instance verdict "deliberately omitted and distorted key facts of infringement" and intentionally "exonerated the Shenzhen Municipal Government Legal Affairs Office, a government agency, from liability for fault," on the grounds that substantial evidence had been submitted to fully prove that the Legal Affairs Office, in "performing its duties,"

Read More →

"Maritime Palace" Case Within a Case: Never Give Up — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Maritime Palace" Case (Serial 31)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Three: Lawyers Bravely Challenge the Legal Affairs Office for Rights Protection 6. Never Give Up Faced with such an absurd final judgment, lawyer Wang Tengfeng did not give up easily. Instead, he remained undaunted and resolutely chose to continue fighting for his rights in accordance with the law. He firmly believed that justice would prevail one day, and with the unyielding will to "dare to drag the emperor off his horse" and the indomitable spirit of "Third Sister Yang taking her case to court," he continued to struggle for his own rights. Lawyer Wang Tengfeng first raised sharp questions about the "Civil Judgment" through the court's "post-judgment答疑" procedure (Figure 118).

Read More →

The "Sea Palace" Case Within a Case: Retrial Turning Point — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 32)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Three: Lawyer's Rights Defense - Bravely Challenging the Legal Affairs Office 7. Retrial Turning Point At noon on July 9, 2014, Director Lawyer Wang Tengfeng, accompanied by his law firm's partner lawyer Zhang Yong and intern lawyer Li Lulu, drove to the Guangdong Provincial High People's Court located at No. 9, Yicun Yihang Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, to attend the retrial hearing organized by the High Court. More than three years had passed since the dispute occurred on April 14, 2011. For lawyer Wang Tengfeng, winning or losing had long ceased to matter; his persistence in applying for a retrial was more a pursuit of the spirit of the rule of law and a legal professional's commitment to...

Read More →

Epilogue: Striving for the Chinese Dream of Rule of Law! — The Ultimate Reveal of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 33)

June 19, 2018 Administrative Litigation

Part Three: Lawyers' Rights Protection - Bravely Challenging the Legal Affairs Office 8. Striving for the Chinese Dream of Rule of Law During the compilation and organization of this book, two major events closely related to this book occurred in our country: First, on October 23, 2014, the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China issued the "Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Several Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Advancing the Rule of Law" (referred to as the "Decision"); Second, on November 1, 2014, the 11th Session of the Standing Committee of the 12th National People's Congress passed by a high vote the "Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on Amending the 'Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China'"...

Read More →

Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm — Firm Culture Showcase

June 15, 2018 Updates

Introduction Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm was established in 2000. After nearly two decades of development, it has become a strong and distinctive comprehensive law firm undergoing transformation, with its overall strength and conditions leading the industry. Zhiming lawyers have always been courageous in using creative thinking and artistic approaches to solve problems for clients, defend their rights, and uphold justice. Zhiming's motto is "Dedication, Respect for the Law, Integrity, and Pragmatism," and its pursuit is "To realize the value of lawyers themselves by creating value for clients."

Read More →

Legal games, military tactics, intelligence and courage to win, resolving difficult cases, and achieving remarkable results!

Classic case

⚖️ Core Services

Civil & Commercial Litigation

Criminal Defense

Administrative Litigation

Financial Securities

International Arbitration

Non-litigation Services

📊 Numbers That Matter

📰 Lawyer Insights

Guangfa Bank Shenzhen Branch's Maritime National Defense Education Parent-Child Activity: A Legal Perspective on Financial Institutions' Compliant Organization of Study Tours

Orthopedic surgery robot training launched in Pingshan, Shenzhen: Analysis of legal risks and compliance key points in the application of new medical technologies.

Orthopedic Surgery Robot Training Launches in Pingshan, Shenzhen: Legal Risks and Compliance Points in the Downward Transfer of Medical Technology

Shenzhen Homestay Summer Compliance Operations: Lawyer's Interpretation of Accommodation Registration, Minors' Check-in, and Privacy Protection

Shenzhen Pingshan Notary Public Office Establishes Three Service Points in Dapeng — How Can Compulsory Enforcement Notarization Solve Difficulties in Enforcing Mediation Agreements?

Shenzhen Dapeng B&B industry training focuses on accommodation registration and protection of minors; lawyer interprets three key points of tourism industry compliance

Husband Dies, Wife's Request to Use Frozen Embryos for Transfer Refused: The Legal Gap and Reproductive Rights Contest Behind the Nation's First Ruling of Its Kind

After a spouse's death, the in-laws transfer millions in compensation—how can the widow recover it legally? A lawyer explains inheritance and tort liability.

Shentong Express Filed for Investigation by the State Post Bureau: Analysis of Compliance Risks and Legal Responsibilities for Express Delivery Enterprises

What is the legal validity of personal terms agreements in football transfers? Lawyer interprets pre-contract breach and compensation practices

Behind the 2025 Legal Writing Competition: Why Lawyers' Professional Expression Has Become a Career Watershed

Behind the Rise of AI Legal Consultation: How Can the Structural Mismatch Between 830,000 Lawyers and Tens of Millions of Cases Be Resolved?

The Post-Courtroom Secret War of the "Sea Palace" Case — The Ultimate Reveal of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 23)

The "Sea Palace" Case: Settlement and Withdrawal of Lawsuit — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 24)

[1] The Joyful Rebirth of the "Sea Palace" — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 25)

Part Three: Lawyers Defend Rights, Bravely Challenging the Legal Affairs Office — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 26)

Speaking out for justice invites government suppression! — The ultimate revelation of the "Sea Palace" case (Serial 27)

Suing the Municipal Legal Affairs Office! — The Ultimate Reveal of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 28)

Minor Errors in the First Instance Verdict of the Case Within the "Sea Palace" Case — Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 29)

The second-instance verdict in the "Sea Palace" case-within-a-case is gravely wrong — The ultimate revelation of the "Sea Palace" case (Serial 30)

"Maritime Palace" Case Within a Case: Never Give Up — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Maritime Palace" Case (Serial 31)

The "Sea Palace" Case Within a Case: Retrial Turning Point — The Ultimate Revelation of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 32)

Epilogue: Striving for the Chinese Dream of Rule of Law! — The Ultimate Reveal of the "Sea Palace" Case (Serial 33)

Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm — Firm Culture Showcase

⚖️ Start Your Professional Legal Service Journey Now