Zhiming Law Firm handles labor dispute cases, successfully dismissing unreasonable claims for enterprises.

[2] The labor dispute case involving economic compensation claims by Zhong Mouliang and Ye Mouqing against a Shenzhen trading company and a third party, Cao Mou, represented by Zhiming Law Firm, was recently concluded in the first instance by a district court in Shenzhen. Our client, the enterprise, achieved a complete victory in safeguarding its rights.

The plaintiffs Zhong and Ye claimed that they were employed by a trading company in Shenzhen from November 2016 to June 2017, engaged in overseas inspection work. They also claimed that during their work, they were engaged in inspection work according to the company's arrangements, sent on business trips, and received salaries, but the company unilaterally terminated them verbally without prior notice. Therefore, the two plaintiffs believe that the company has infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of the workers, and request the court to order the company to bear a total of approximately 100000 yuan in economic compensation, including double the salary difference for the unsigned labor contract, economic compensation for the termination of the labor contract, and loss of travel expenses during work. After the court accepted the trial, the company seemed to be in a disadvantageous and passive position for a while, and the company's executives felt deeply affected; Extortion and blackmail; The pain. Helpless, the enterprise sought help from Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm, hoping that Zhiming lawyers could use their unique strategies and techniques to uncover the truth, maintain fairness, protect the rights of the enterprise, and resist malicious litigation.

[4] After accepting the case and understanding the details, Zhiming Law Firm quickly clarified the facts and distinguished truth from falsehood from numerous circumstances to protect the legitimate interests of the enterprise client from extortion. The lawyers discovered that the factual evidence supporting the plaintiffs' claim of an employment relationship with the defendant enterprise within less than half a year was unclear and insufficient. It remained uncertain whether the plaintiffs had some connection with the third party, Cao Mou, the company's former legal representative, or whether an employment relationship existed between them personally. From this perspective, Zhiming lawyers gathered sufficient and compelling factual evidence to assist the court in the trial, swiftly turning the tide from a passive and disadvantageous position. In court, our lawyers performed excellently, presenting persuasive arguments grounded in reason, emotion, and law, along with a rigorous and complete chain of evidence, which ultimately gained the first-instance court's acceptance. The facts and evidence presented by the plaintiffs lacked sufficient persuasive power in terms of reason, emotion, and law, and the court did not accept them. The court ultimately ruled that no labor relationship existed between the plaintiffs and the defendant enterprise, legally dismissed all of the plaintiffs' claims, and issued a judgment in favor of our client, the defendant enterprise, recently.