Zhiming Law Firm handles labor dispute cases, successfully dismissing unreasonable claims for enterprises.

In the labor dispute case where Shenzhen某 Trading Company, represented by Zhiming Law Firm, and the third party Cao某 were sued by Zhong某lang and Ye某qing for economic compensation, the first-instance trial was recently concluded by a district court in Shenzhen. Our representation of the corporate client in defending its rights achieved a complete victory.

Plaintiffs Zhong Moulang and Ye Mouqing claimed that they were employed by a trading company in Shenzhen from November 2016 to June 2017, engaged in dispatched product inspection work. They stated that during their employment, they performed inspection duties as arranged by the company, traveled on business trips per the company's assignments, and received wages, yet the company unilaterally terminated them verbally without prior notice. Therefore, the two plaintiffs argued that the company infringed upon their legitimate labor rights and requested the court to order the company to pay compensation totaling approximately 100,000 yuan, including double wages for the failure to sign a labor contract, economic compensation for termination of the labor relationship, and losses for business trip travel expenses during employment. After the court accepted and heard the case, the company momentarily found itself in a disadvantageous position, with its executives deeply feeling the distress of being "extorted." In desperation, the company sought help from Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm, hoping that its lawyers could employ original strategies and techniques to uncover the truth, uphold fairness, protect the company's rights, and resist malicious litigation.

After accepting the case and understanding the facts, Zhiming Law Firm, in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the corporate client from extortion, swiftly clarified the rights and wrongs from numerous factual circumstances and ascertained the truth. The lawyers discovered that the factual evidence cited by the plaintiff, a "migrant worker," regarding an alleged labor relationship with the defendant enterprise within less than six months was unclear and insufficient. Whether the plaintiff had some connection with a third party, namely the company's former legal representative Cao, and whether an employment relationship existed between them personally, remained uncertain. From this angle, Zhiming lawyers gathered ample and compelling factual evidence to assist the court proceedings, quickly reversing the previously passive and unfavorable situation. In court, our lawyers performed excellently, presenting persuasive arguments grounded in reason, emotion, and law, along with a meticulous and rigorous chain of evidence, which ultimately gained the acceptance of the first-instance court. The facts and evidence asserted by the plaintiff lacked sufficient persuasive power in terms of reason, emotion, and law, and the court did not accept them. The court ultimately ruled that no labor relationship existed between the plaintiff and the defendant enterprise, lawfully dismissed all of the plaintiff's claims, and issued a judgment in favor of the defendant enterprise we represented, delivering a complete victory, with the ruling recently handed down.