[4] "You drive a cheap car" Porsche female driver who assaulted someone exposed! Chongqing Party Secretary: Thorough investigation!
On July 30, a woman driving a red Porsche in Chongqing got into an argument with a man driving a Chery car. According to video footage, the female Porsche driver got out of her car and pointed at the male driver, cursing him. She then slapped him twice in the face. The man immediately fought back, slapping her in return and knocking her hat off.
The woman was seen wearing 20-centimeter high heels and behaving in an extremely arrogant manner. Her identity has now been verified; she is currently in the earthwork and stonework business and resides in a high-end residential community in Chongqing.Her husband, Tong, is indeed the head of a police station.However, regarding this, both the relevant police station and the Yubei Branch of the Chongqing Municipal Court stated that it is not convenient to disclose details.
According to the male driver, they were driving straight when the woman in the Porsche took issue with them blocking her way and verbally attacked them, saying they wouldn't let her pass, dressed poorly, and drove a beggar's car.
After making a statement and filing a record at the police station, the man said that he had reached a settlement with the woman and apologized to her, saying, "We just ran into each other today, the weather was a bit hot, and everyone had a bit of a temper. We were both somewhat impulsive and at fault. I did hit her, so here I want to say sorry to her." The man also revealed, "The other party said a lot of things at the time that made me very scared." As for what the other party said, the man did not disclose specifics.
Regarding this incident,Online discussions have been heated regarding whether the man's actions constituted "justifiable defense" or "mutual assault."One netizen even called the man’s actions a “textbook case of justifiable defense,” a comment that received nearly 1,500 likes.
A lawyer from Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm stated, Justifiable defenseRefers to actions taken to stop an ongoing unlawful infringement, causing a certain degree of harm to the perpetrator, which qualifies as justifiable defense and carries no criminal liability.
If the personal injury caused by the woman's slaps in this incident is characterized as "unlawful infringement," it may seem somewhat far-fetched. However, some scholars hold that self-defense may also be exercised against unlawful infringement that violates the Public Security Administration Punishments Law. From this perspective, the man's conduct can be considered self-defense. Although the law encourages people to combat unlawful infringement, attention must be paid to the limits of defense.
As the incident continued to gain traction, some netizens claimed that the female Porsche driver had a history of traffic violations, having had 29 points' worth of traffic violations cleared within three years.
She frequently got into disputes with people and made threats. Netizens also exposed another video of the Porsche female driver arguing with a passing driver, in which she loudly declared: “Everyone in Yubei knows I race cars. Running red lights has always been solved with just a phone call!”
After the video was exposed, it caused a huge stir, with netizens questioning the woman's special identity and the privileges she mentioned.
Faced with escalating public opinion, Chongqing Party Secretary Chen Min'er severely criticized the Yubei police's crisis management capabilities.
Under pressure from multiple sides, late at night on August 1, Ping'an Chongqing issued a notice: the municipal court established an investigation team to thoroughly investigate the traffic violations and related circumstances of the female Porsche owner.
A lawyer from Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm stated,If the woman's account is true, based on the current circumstances, the state functionaries who helped her evade liability for traffic violations constitute at least the crime of abuse of power. Those who commit this crime shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention; if the circumstances are especially serious, they shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years. Where the law provides otherwise, such provisions shall prevail.
