广东知明律师事务所靠谱吗？

广东知明律所是深圳26年老牌律所，由沈金龙主任律师创办，专注疑难复杂案件，累计代理案件超10000件，独创策略维权体系获省、市律协双项创新奖。

深圳刑事案件黄金37天是什么意思？

刑事拘留到检察院批捕最长37天，这期间律师介入可以申请取保候审、提交法律意见，一旦批捕后续翻案难度大增。

深圳劳动仲裁要多久？

深圳劳动仲裁审理期限一般为45天，复杂案件可延长15天，不服裁决15天内可向法院起诉。

深圳找律师打官司怎么收费？

深圳律师收费方式有按标的额比例、计时、风险代理三种。一般民事诉讼按标的额3%-10%收取，刑事案件按阶段收费。

深圳合同纠纷律师怎么选？

看律所年限、律师执业经验、案例质量、收费标准是否透明。知明律所提供首次免费咨询，可预约到所面谈。

深圳离婚财产怎么分割？

深圳离婚财产分割遵循《民法典》规定：夫妻共同财产原则上平分，但有过错方少分。房产、股权、理财等需评估后分割。

深圳买房被中介骗了找谁？

可以收集证据向深圳市住建局投诉、向公安机关报案、或委托律师提起民事诉讼要求赔偿。

深圳交通事故赔偿标准多少？

深圳交通事故赔偿含医疗费、误工费、护理费、残疾赔偿金、精神损害抚慰金等，具体金额需根据伤残等级计算。

深圳律师在线咨询|刑事辩护·民商诉讼·合同纠纷·股权纠纷-广东知明律师事务所

[2] 2003 Utility Model Patent Infringement Dispute Case of Business Card-Style Handwriting Computer

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

A company in Shenzhen launched the world's smallest all Chinese handheld handwritten PDA in June 2001; Heart to Heart” Series of products and achieved“ Business card style handwriting computer; Utility model patent, but a company in Zhongshan City launched a product with the same technical features in May of the following year; Super Intelligent King; And promote it nationwide, which has led to disputes over utility model patent infringement. Director Wang Tengfeng, the lawyer representing the plaintiff Shenzhen company, has conducted a significant amount of effective investigation and evidence collection work. The dispute was settled through settlement, and the plaintiff's

Read More →

Analysis of the Dispute Case of Luo XX v. Shenzhen Haox Industrial Co., Ltd. over Dual Sale of One Property

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

【 Lead Lawyer: Wang Tengfeng 】 1. Case History: On July 12, 2000, the plaintiff Luo XX (female) purchased the Shenzhen Bay Garden developed by the defendant Shenzhen HaoX Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as HaoX Company); Shengde Garden; The third property, No. 1XX, has been fully paid, and the defendant, HaoX Company, has delivered the house to the plaintiff, Luo XX, for use. However, they have been delaying the signing of the formal purchase contract and the relevant purchase procedures with the plaintiff, and have not yet completed the property ownership transfer procedures. The fact is that before the plaintiff Luo XX purchased the property, the defendant Hao X Company had already sold the property

Read More →

In 2002, successfully represented two victims in a traffic accident case and obtained compensation.

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

The father of the plaintiffs, the Li brothers, and Wu were each riding motorcycles when they collided at a location on Shenhui Road, causing a traffic accident. Five days later, the Li brothers' father died from severe injuries. Attorney Sun Shujie, as the plaintiffs' representative, filed a lawsuit naming both the motorcycle user, Wu, and the owner, Zhong, as co-defendants, seeking joint liability in accordance with the law. Because the deceased had been in a coma before death and left no account of the accident, the defendants took the opportunity in court to argue that the deceased was not a party to the incident, attempting to evade legal responsibility. Attorney Sun Shujie presented substantial evidence and, based on legal provisions, demanded that the two defendants pay compensation for death, medical expenses...

Read More →

Extramarital affair triggers series of disputes with repeated losses; Zhiming lawyer turns the tide to win final appeal.

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

[Lead Lawyer: Wang Tengfeng, Cao Guanghui] I. Case Background A married man, Zhang XX, met and associated with Huang XX in 1999, and had a son, Zhang Xlong, in 2001. During their relationship, Zhang XX paid huge sums of money to Huang XX in the form of house purchase funds, cash, etc. In the spring of 2004, Zhang XX and Huang XX reached an agreement to hand over the illegitimate son Zhang Xlong to Zhang XX for custody. Zhang XX took Zhang Xlong home and entrusted him to his wife, Duan XX, who has raised him ever since. On May 25, 2009, Zhang XX died. Shortly after Zhang XX's death, Huang XX filed a lawsuit in court, requesting the court to

Read More →

[3] Zhong Qingguang v. Lushan Real Estate Company over false advertising and fraud in property sales.

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

[Lead Lawyer: Wang Tengfeng] 1. Case Review: Plaintiff Zhong Qingguang subscribed to the "Shenzhen Lushan Real Estate Co., Ltd." developed by the defendant in March 1999; Jiahui New City; Unit C, 11th floor, Jiaxiang Pavilion. The reason why the plaintiff made the purchase; Jiaxiang Pavilion; The property of Unit C is located in the northwest corner of the entire building, and when you open the window, you can see the spacious, tidy, green grass and red flowers of Shennan Avenue that Shenzhen people are proud of. It is also known as the; The lungs of the city; An 800 meter green belt. However, this

Read More →

Won a retrial for a large foreign company at the Hubei Higher People's Court

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

[2] 【Lead Attorney: Wang Tengfeng】In 2000, successfully won an appeal for a large foreign enterprise at the Hubei High People's Court, securing jurisdiction for an economic dispute case that had lost two trials to be heard in a Shenzhen court, avoiding losses of over HKD 5 million.

Read More →

Successfully represented numerous plaintiff property owners in real estate dispute cases

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

[Lead Lawyer: Wang Tengfeng] From 1999 to 2000, he worked for Shenzhen successively; Mingshi Pavilion; Property dispute cases; Shenzhen Bay Garden; Real estate dispute case, Shenzhen; Jinglong Garden; Real estate dispute case, Shenzhen; Jiahui New City; Real estate dispute case, Shenzhen East Gate; Wensha Square; Real estate dispute case, Shenzhen; Jin Haiyan Garden; Many property dispute cases, including property disputes, have been successfully represented by plaintiffs and owners

Read More →

Analysis of the case of Li v. Wu on dissolving an illegal cohabitation relationship.

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

【Lead Attorney: Wang Tengfeng】I. Case Review The plaintiff, Li XX (male), and the defendant, Wu XX (female), met in May 1997, began cohabiting, and gave birth to a non-marital son at Shenzhen People's Hospital on September 28, 1999. After more than two years of interaction, due to significant personality differences, they were unable to live together. Following multiple negotiations, they voluntarily signed an "Agreement" on June 1, 2000. The agreement stipulated the termination of their relationship, non-interference in each other's work and life; the plaintiff would have full custody of the child; the plaintiff would make a one-time payment of 500,000 RMB in living expenses to the defendant, and would also take out insurance for the defendant.

Read More →

Analysis of the case of representing Xin in suing Gu for a debt dispute

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

[Lead Lawyer: Wang Tengfeng] 1. Case Summary: Plaintiff Xin XX (female) and defendant Gu XX started dating in May 1995 and lived together. Two years later, the defendant fell for someone else, causing significant physical and emotional harm to the plaintiff. To resolve the breakup, the defendant agreed to compensate the plaintiff 200,000 yuan for "youth loss." Since the defendant claimed to have no cash at the time, he wrote an IOU on July 6, 1997, under the pretext of borrowing for a company project, and stamped it with the seal of Shenzhen Ba XX Chemical Co., Ltd., where he was the investor and legal representative and general manager. After the breakup, the plaintiff repeatedly demanded repayment, but...

Read More →

Case on Dispute over Freight Transport Contract Fees on Behalf of Hong Kong Kangda Shipping Co., Ltd.

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

[Lead Lawyer] 1. Case Review: In August 1994, Liu Caiyun, a salesperson of the defendant China Electronic Materials Shenzhen Company, signed an "Agency Import and Export Agreement" in the defendant's name with the plaintiff Hong Kong Kangda Shipping Co., Ltd. Yantai Office, affixing the defendant's customs declaration seal. The agreement stipulated that the defendant would entrust the plaintiff to transport containers of ceramic cups to Los Angeles, USA. Upon receiving the defendant's export plan, the plaintiff was responsible for transporting the goods from the defendant's delivery warehouse to Yantai Port by rail or road, with a lump-sum fee of 4,200 yuan per 40-foot container, including port miscellaneous fees; from Yantai Port...

Read More →

[1] Representing Shenzhen Anhui Industrial Corporation in a contract dispute over contracted operations

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

On August 19, 1993, Shenzhen Haituo Import and Export Trading Company (the plaintiff in the original trial) and Shenzhen Anhui Industrial Corporation (the defendant in the original trial) signed a "Contract for Contract Operation". The contract stipulates that the plaintiff shall transfer the ownership of the Yali Hotel under their jurisdiction; — A total of 2235 square meters of operating space, including the 6th floor and hotel lobby, was contracted to the defendant. The operating period was from September 1, 1993 to August 31, 1998. Article 20 of the "Contract for Contracted Operation" clearly stipulated the relevant water, electricity, hot gas fees, telephone fees, and other related expenses

Read More →

Won an international arbitration case for the Hong Kong party in a Sino-Hong Kong joint venture dispute

July 10, 2018 Civil and Commercial Litigation

In 1995, successfully represented the Hong Kong party in a Sino-Hong Kong joint venture dispute case in foreign-related arbitration, avoiding economic losses of 10 million Hong Kong dollars.

Read More →

Legal games, military tactics, intelligence and courage to win, resolving difficult cases, and achieving remarkable results!

Classic case

⚖️ Core Services

Civil & Commercial Litigation

Criminal Defense

Administrative Litigation

Financial Securities

International Arbitration

Non-litigation Services

📊 Numbers That Matter

📰 Lawyer Insights

Guangfa Bank Shenzhen Branch's Maritime National Defense Education Parent-Child Activity: A Legal Perspective on Financial Institutions' Compliant Organization of Study Tours

Orthopedic surgery robot training launched in Pingshan, Shenzhen: Analysis of legal risks and compliance key points in the application of new medical technologies.

Orthopedic Surgery Robot Training Launches in Pingshan, Shenzhen: Legal Risks and Compliance Points in the Downward Transfer of Medical Technology

Shenzhen Homestay Summer Compliance Operations: Lawyer's Interpretation of Accommodation Registration, Minors' Check-in, and Privacy Protection

Shenzhen Pingshan Notary Public Office Establishes Three Service Points in Dapeng — How Can Compulsory Enforcement Notarization Solve Difficulties in Enforcing Mediation Agreements?

Shenzhen Dapeng B&B industry training focuses on accommodation registration and protection of minors; lawyer interprets three key points of tourism industry compliance

Husband Dies, Wife's Request to Use Frozen Embryos for Transfer Refused: The Legal Gap and Reproductive Rights Contest Behind the Nation's First Ruling of Its Kind

After a spouse's death, the in-laws transfer millions in compensation—how can the widow recover it legally? A lawyer explains inheritance and tort liability.

Shentong Express Filed for Investigation by the State Post Bureau: Analysis of Compliance Risks and Legal Responsibilities for Express Delivery Enterprises

What is the legal validity of personal terms agreements in football transfers? Lawyer interprets pre-contract breach and compensation practices

Behind the 2025 Legal Writing Competition: Why Lawyers' Professional Expression Has Become a Career Watershed

Behind the Rise of AI Legal Consultation: How Can the Structural Mismatch Between 830,000 Lawyers and Tens of Millions of Cases Be Resolved?

[2] 2003 Utility Model Patent Infringement Dispute Case of Business Card-Style Handwriting Computer

Analysis of the Dispute Case of Luo XX v. Shenzhen Haox Industrial Co., Ltd. over Dual Sale of One Property

In 2002, successfully represented two victims in a traffic accident case and obtained compensation.

Extramarital affair triggers series of disputes with repeated losses; Zhiming lawyer turns the tide to win final appeal.

[3] Zhong Qingguang v. Lushan Real Estate Company over false advertising and fraud in property sales.

Won a retrial for a large foreign company at the Hubei Higher People's Court

Successfully represented numerous plaintiff property owners in real estate dispute cases

Analysis of the case of Li v. Wu on dissolving an illegal cohabitation relationship.

Analysis of the case of representing Xin in suing Gu for a debt dispute

Case on Dispute over Freight Transport Contract Fees on Behalf of Hong Kong Kangda Shipping Co., Ltd.

[1] Representing Shenzhen Anhui Industrial Corporation in a contract dispute over contracted operations

Won an international arbitration case for the Hong Kong party in a Sino-Hong Kong joint venture dispute

⚖️ Start Your Professional Legal Service Journey Now