Married man regrets gifting luxury car after affair; deceived woman hires renowned lawyer to protect rights.
Recently, a second-instance court ruling in favor of the client was delivered to the team of lawyers at Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm.
Image source: Internet
In September 2013, a Shenzhen man surnamed Yang spent over 300,000 yuan to buy an Audi car for his girlfriend surnamed Lin. A few months later, Lin suddenly discovered that Yang was married, so she decisively broke up with him. Afterwards, Yang, unwilling to accept this, repeatedly demanded the return of the Audi car he had gifted to Lin, but was refused. Failing to recover the car, Yang filed a lawsuit against his former girlfriend. The first-instance court ruled against Yang's claim. Dissatisfied, Yang appealed.
Image source: Internet
To quickly free herself from her ex-boyfriend's harassment, Lin, whose name is withheld, sought out the Zhiming Law Firm's legal team in Guangdong for representation in the lawsuit. During the second-instance trial, Yang, also name withheld, continued to insist that the car he had given Lin was a loan rather than a gift. Our attorneys engaged in a fierce debate with the opposing side, presenting a wealth of factual evidence and legal reasoning that deeply impressed the judges, who came to agree with our position. The second-instance court ultimately rejected the opposing party's appeal and upheld the original judgment. Thanks to the efforts of the Zhiming legal team, the client lawfully retained the Audi sedan she had received as a gift.
(The above names are pseudonyms.)