"Deadbeat" Buyer Refuses Payment, Zhiming Lawyer Files Lawsuit for Recovery
Recently, Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm received another favorable second-instance judgment.
In 2009, a company in Shenzhen (referred to as "Shenzhen Company A") signed a sales contract for lighting equipment with a company in Xiamen (referred to as "Xiamen Company B"). After receiving the goods, Xiamen Company B refused to pay the substantial amount of hundreds of thousands of yuan for the purchase. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to demand payment, Shenzhen Company A entrusted the legal team of Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm to handle the litigation.
The lawyers of the Zhiming Suo team, through extensive research, keenly discovered that the "Feedback on Faults of Streetlight Energy-Saving Equipment" submitted by Xiamen Mouxing Company had exceeded the quality objection period, and raised this point immediately in court. The judge also accepted the arguments put forward by our legal counsel. In the end, the first-instance judgment ordered the defendant, Xiamen Mouxing Company, to pay the remaining货款 to Shenzhen Moutong Company within the specified period as stipulated in the contract.
After Xiamen某星Company appealed the judgment, the lawyers from Zhiming Law Firm's team continued to represent the appellee, Shenzhen某通Company. Ultimately, thanks to our attorneys' vigorous advocacy, the intermediate court in the second instance upheld the original judgment. Shenzhen某通Company also recovered the payment for goods, and the client expressed gratitude to our attorneys.
