After painstaking efforts, he was falsely accused. Zhiming lawyers revealed the story behind the alleged "capital flight."

In the golden autumn of September, the legal team of Wang Tengfeng at Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm received a favorable judgment. The case handler, lawyer Peng Jiong, quickly informed the clients, Mr. Wang and Ms. Li, whose long-clouded mood finally cleared up.

 
In 2010, Mr. Wang and Ms. Li jointly established Company A. Since the company had not been profitable, they transferred the capital contribution of 1 million yuan to Company B to purchase production equipment, and the remaining tens of thousands of yuan after the purchase were transferred back to Company A. However, unexpectedly, the company later suffered from poor management and had to declare bankruptcy. At that point, the company's head recalled the 1 million yuan capital contribution, believing that Mr. Wang and Ms. Li had not actually purchased equipment but had instead withdrawn capital, and thus sued them, demanding the return of the capital contribution with interest and the assumption of litigation costs.
 
Mr. Wang and Ms. Li never thought they would be sued by their own company, so they quickly consulted multiple law firms, hoping to hear different opinions. That day, Mr. Wang and Ms. Li came to Zhiming Institute and recounted the events one by one as usual. Lawyer Wang roughly reviewed their case materials during this process. After listening, Lawyer Wang pointed out to the point with his years of experience in handling cases:; Transferring funds and withdrawing funds cannot be equated! ” Mr. Wang and Ms. Li have felt the professional ability of Lawyer Wang, which is incomparable to those lawyers before! The two of them immediately entrusted this case to the legal team of Wang Tengfeng. Under the guidance of Lawyer Wang's lawsuit for literary and artistic rights protection, our speech in court was strong and persuasive, explaining the continuity of transfer and refund times, the company's operating conditions, and the rationality of the parties' operations. We successfully convinced the judge in one go, which led to this inspiring winning judgment.
 
This brilliant victory was due not only to the team's solid professional knowledge but also to their tireless efforts and years of accumulated case experience. Initially, the clients had full confidence in us; now, we have lived up to their expectations and returned victorious!