Under the guise of investment, the act of borrowing money was carried out without repayment. The knowledgeable lawyer skillfully broke through the illusion to protect the client's rights.
Yesterday, the Wang Tengfeng lawyer team from Guangdong Zhiming Law Firm received a favorable judgment, bringing to an end a contract dispute case with a contract amount of nearly ten million. Lawyers Wang Tengfeng and Zhang Qingping, who handled the case, couldn't help but exclaim: 'Finally reaching a satisfactory conclusion, all the hard work was worth it!'
Recalling the scene when Ms. Yu first came to Zhiming for help, it still seems vivid in my mind. At that time, Ms. Yu looked utterly helpless, her hoarse voice recounting the whole background of the case, and the thick stack of evidence materials had long been memorized by her. 'It was supposed to be a loan at the beginning, but now it has turned into an investment; there’s no interest, and I can’t get my money back. What should I do?' Ms. Yu was as desperate as if she had fallen into an abyss. She learned that Lawyer Wang Tengfeng's team was famous for resolving difficult and complex major cases, so she came with the last bit of hope to seek help.
Lawyer Wang Tengfeng led Lawyer Zhang Qingping to immediately accept Ms. Yu's commission after gaining a basic understanding of the case. Afterwards, Lawyer Wang and Lawyer Zhang repeatedly reviewed the materials. Lawyer Wang, based on his years of experience in handling cases, pointed out to the point that the other party was trying to embezzle our client's loan and even fantasized about using the so-called "ldquo; Investment Agreement; Come and deceive the world! In addition, the shareholder Lin of the company also issued a "Guarantee Letter". Lawyer Wang used literary and artistic rights litigation to broaden his thinking and explore new paths, grasping the key points of the case and guiding Lawyer Zhang to quickly prepare the prosecution materials and submit them to the court. In court, the other party not only argued that the relationship between the two parties was an investment relationship rather than a loan relationship, but also argued that Lin (the second defendant in this case), as a shareholder of the company, should not bear joint and several liability. This is simply unfounded, unreasonable, and unreasonable. Under our strong attack, the other side suffered successive defeats, but in the end, the court fully supported our demands.
This victorious judgment is, for Zhiming, a reflection of professional competence and also an honor; for the client, it is a protection of personal rights and also a reassurance.
